MINUTES
OF IESM GOVERNING BODY MEETING
HELD
ON 07 OCTOBER 2015
General
1. The IESM Governing Body (GB) meeting was
held on 7/10/2015. The GB was meeting after a long gap - the last meeting was
held on 23/3/2015 - as the General Secretary had failed to call a meeting
despite being advised.
Review
of Pending Points
2. It was decided in the last meeting that
in compliance with the IESM MoA, the
accounts from Jan 2013 onward would be shown to and countersigned by the
Chairman on 7/4/2015. However, the three operators of the account (Vice
Chairman Maj Gen Satbir Singh, Treasurer Wg Cdr CK Sharma and Gen Secy Gp Capt
VK Gandhi) did not comply with the decision. Stressing the point that
opaqueness in the accounts would lead to suspicion, the GB again urged the three
to ensure compliance of the earlier GB decision.
Update
on Court Cases
3. The GB was updated on the progress of
the following cases:
a)
Writ petitions
filed by Gp Capt VK Gandhi in the Punjab & Haryana High Court against
dissolution of the GB by the IESM general body on 28/7/2013 and its approval by
the District as well as the State Registrar.
b)
Hearing in
Gurgaon court of the charges of misappropriation, fraud and cheating of IESM
funds by Vice Chairman Maj Gen Satbir Singh, Treasurer Wg Cdr CK Sharma and Gen
Secy Gp Capt VK Gandhi.
Review
of IESM actions on OROP
4. The GB recalled the sustained efforts
from 2008 to 2014 made by the IESM in
bringing OROP to the front burner and in gradually whittling down Govt
opposition to it. This resulted in finally acceptance of OROP by the Govt in
Parliament on 17/2/2014. Those successful efforts and the strategy should be
reinforced to finally see OROP through.
Core
Values of IESM
5. The GB again stressed the IESM
commitment to its core values such as:
a)
OROP being the
main demand, keep focus on it.
b)
Keeping the
actions confined to veterans' issues and not delve into any matter pertaining
to the serving.
c)
Keep the IESM
totally apolitical and not let IESM be aligned with any political party, nor permit
any politician on own stage.
d)
A soldier's
life is sacred and is meant to be sacrificed only on the battlefield for the
national cause; no fast undo death.
e)
Maintain dignity
and not use any derogatory or abusive language/gestures against any
political/military leader.
6. The
GB noted with concern violation of above values by certain individuals and
illegally misusing the IESM name/banner during such actions. The GB resolved that
the IESM fully dissociates itself from any such activity.
Actions
at Jantar Mantar
7. The GB appreciated the efforts made by
some colleagues to highlight OROP issue further. However, it noted that efforts
not are synonymous with results. So far there has been no concrete result. The
old 2008-2014 strategy should have continued to be followed to wear down the
Govt. There was a greater chance of success even if took longer. Putting the issue avoidably on full boil has come
at a heavy price. It has led to following apparent negatives:
a)
The Govt
announced a greatly diluted version of OROP.
b)
With our strident
rhetoric against the Govt, all channels of communication are closed, rendering
any further negotiation extremely difficult.
c)
The one-time
public support is getting weaker; as is evident from voices on social media.
d)
The media has
cooled off.
e)
The fulcrum of
officer-man bondage is coming unstuck, with the JCOs/OR paving their own
way.
Propaganda
and Falsehood
8. The Jantar Mantar has become a notorious
font of falsehoods and propaganda by self-appointed media advisors/experts. The
reports say, there has been smear campaign against the Chairman in absentia.
Some of the yarn being spun is a mix of old and new misinformation. A few examples:
a)
Blocking of
IESM Accounts.
Fact
- The bank had no business to block the account. It has been
done at the behest of the account operators -
Maj Gen Satbir Singh, Wg Cdr CK
Sharma and Gp Capt VK Gandhi. They got it done to find a pretext to collect
funds in cash. To this end, they even misused the influence of one Mr G Singh,
who is senior officer in the bank hierarchy and is a close relative of one of
these three individuals. Such allegation is a clear case of villains playing
victims.
b)
The Chairman had joined CWG only to scuttle OROP.
Fact
- The Chairman
joined CWG on 30/1/2008 much before IESM was even conceived. Even being in the
CWG, he was the first to court arrest, first to deposit his medals, first to
sit for 24 hours hunger strike and led all the rallies at Jantar Mantar. His
employment with the CWG in no way interfered with his leading the struggle for
OROP.
c) The Four JCOs that Complained of
wrong-doing in the 2012 IESM
elections all belonged to Chairman's Village.
Fact
- This lie was told by Maj Gen Satbir Singh and Gp Capt VK Gandhi during hearing before the
State Registrar. The Registrar merely looked at the four petitions in the file
placed before him where the petitioners had given their home addresses. When he
found that not only four different villages but they belonged to even different
districts, he openly mocked at the accusers.
Unfortunately, the eight officers who got into the GB through backdoor
by skulduggery and by cheating the JCO/OR candidates, and who have no moral
right to continue, are feeling peeved that the election process was
successfully challenged by some who were wronged. So much for the Chetwode
motto!
d) The Chairman used to meet the RM
alone.
Fact: The Chairman had been meeting the RM since
2009 both in (several) delegations as well as alone. Details of all such
meetings were always disseminated through sitreps. Apart from other tangible
outcome, these meetings contributed greatly in the
OROP finally coming through. The entire GB was happy with this. It was only
after 24/7/2013 when a meeting of the general body was summoned and GB feared
dissolution due to their financial and election irregularities, that the GB
members began finding non-existent faults. Even in Dec 2012, the Chairman was
re-elected unopposed. If there had been
any grouse on this or any other score, the same would not have been possible.
9. The propagandists have also been
circulating messages castigating the country for their ingratitude towards the
armed forces. This is totally uncalled for and unwarranted, as the country has
always stood by and continues to stand by the defence forces. There can be no
better example of picking at one's healthiest tooth. Even worse, messages
through social media are frequently being circulated attempting to cause dissatisfaction among the
serving. This is nothing short of sedition.
Unauthorised
use of IESM designations
10. It was noted by the GB with concern that
the Vice Chairman Maj Gen Satbir Singh, continues to show himself
as the Chairman in various communications, which is illegal and incorrect. The Chairman clarified that he had advised the
Vice Chairman not to do so. However, the Vice Chairman's ambition seems to override his prudence and
maturity. The GB authorised the Chairman to take whatever action deemed
appropriate in this regard.
Jantar
Mantar Accounts
11.
Members brought out that large amount of funds have been collected, including
in cash, at Jantar Mantar in the name of IESM and no accounts have been
rendered so far. This is bringing bad name to the organisation. The fund
collection must be made transparent and must be accounted for. After discussion,
it was decided that the three functionaries (Vice Chairman Maj Gen Satbir
Singh, Treasurer Wg Cdr CK Sharma and Gen Secy Gp Capt VK Gandhi), be asked to
put in a tabulated form on the net and social media, following details of the
funds collected from 14/6/2015 onward:
a)
Date of receipt of funds
b)
Name of the donor/contributor
c)
Amount donated/contributed
d)
Mode of payment ie Crossed cheque/self cheque/cash
e)
Name of bank and account number where deposited
12. In case the threesome fail to comply with
the request, the GB will take whatever further action it deems correct and
necessary.
Critical
Pending Issues of OROP
13. As a take-off from the Defence Minister's
Press conference of 5/9/2015, the following two issues remain to be pursued.
a) Periodicity of Pension
Equalisation.
This forms the very principle of
OROP. Anything other than the annual
equalisation will render the definition of OROP null and void. Unfortunately the veterans' position has already
been compromised by Maj Gen Satbir Singh, who without any authority, agreed to
a two-yearly periodicity. Thus the principle stands sacrificed for expediency. Getting
the Govt to agree now to change to the annual frequency will be an uphill task,
but must be tried.
b) Fixing of Bench Mark for Pension.
The Press conference talked of
taking the lowest and the highest pension of a sample population of a rank and
taking the mean figure as the bench mark. The 'mean' or average will lead to
one rank many pensions, thus nullifying the very basis of OROP. An alternative method as worked out earlier
by the Defence Minister himself, needs to be adhered to.
Closing
Points
14. The GB reaffirmed the IESM resolve to
pursue OROP till finality. However, dealing with a complicated issue and with a
farrago of ranks/categories of the veteran community requires patience and negotiating
deftness; open confrontation, creating hype through provocative sloganeering is
not the best option.
Lt
Gen Raj Kadyan
Chairman
IESM
&
Adviser UF ESM
I feel that I ESM should make an effort to unite the ESM community . It seems your basic emphasis is on the funds and their management whereas we try and unite for the useful results. We expect I ESM to lead a united veterans community .
ReplyDelete